Re: [iPad] Re: Reading books on the iPad versus the Kindle?/changed to cell pho

 

I know you do. Just a pity that when I put forward a point re marking OT stuff as OT I get cut down. 

Particularly as this was raised by others in the recent past

But all good. I'm on my front porch having a beer , hydrating from a 34C day. I've been in Louisiana on 100F days but our ozone layer is poor. It's burning in the direct sun. 100F is about 39C

Yea Jim I do realise that beer, like coffee is a diuretic, that is totally irrelevant!!!

Sent from my iPhone 5 


On 5/12/2012, at 4:41 PM, Elizabeth <eawalker@charter.net> wrote:

 

We try. We forget. We mean well.

E in Long Beach
Sent from my new mini iPad!

On Dec 4, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz> wrote:

 

I have no issue with threads wandering. I have no issue with OT. Is it so hard that when a threads drifts to OT that the poster adds OT to the subject header?
 
What annoys me about the negative replies to this simple request is that a few weeks ago this was raised by others, the resolvment iirc was to ensure we add OT so that those who do not wish to read every single thread to check if it is of interest, can opt to delete.

From: Just Murray <krismurray@gmail.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 5 December 2012 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Re: Reading books on the iPad versus the Kindle?/changed to cell pho
 
It's relevant because that convo triggered this one. Kinda like in a real convo it starts off about hairy toes and ends up talking about the mating rituals of polar bears. Drift happens.

~KM
--
\,,/(^_^)\,,/

(^= I rocked this email on my iPad2 =^)
---

On Dec 4, 2012, at 4:00 AM, Tony <mailto:tdale%40xtra.co.nz> wrote:

> How is this relevant to reading books on the iPad vs Kindle

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (20)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___