Yes I believe he would have. But only when done perfectly. I think that still whatever are seeing with 8 and 10 have his influence. Things like these are years in the making. IMO. In my guesstimation.
~KLM
~KLM
\\ "Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing." ~Helen Keller //
I think you're right. The big change I noticed was that with the release of iOS 8, third party apps can talk to Apple apps. That's a biggie. I like the way Apple is doing it too. Each third party app api must go through a security check to get to the app it wants to talk to. That's the whole thing about extensions. One example used was being able to use the app Waterlogue with the native camera photo editor on iPhone/iPad. Do you think Jobs would have allowed that? I don't. Not even with the security check being put in place.
Sent from my iPadEDIT, and a doh, for good measure
All of this could only happen under Cooks watch and it seems to be happening IMHO
Sent from my iPad Air 🍎
> On 10/06/2014, at 4:01 pm, "Tony tdale@xtra.co.nz [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> All of this could not happen under cooks watch and it seems to be happening IMHO
__._,_.___
Posted by: Just Murray <krismurray@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (102) |
.
__,_._,___