Re: [iPad] The 227-Year-Old Statute Being Used to Order Apple to Endanger Your Privacy, Explained

 

That's fine by me 

~KLM
\\ All we have to decide is what to do with the time given to us //

On Mar 3, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Alice Saunders lwr32@mac.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Then make it so iCloud info can't be gotten by anyone but the person who put the information there.  

On Mar 02, 2016, at 01:18 PM, "Kris Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 


With a court order if the info can be gotten it should've given up in this case the info cannot be gotten. 

~KLM any
\\ All we have to decide is what to do with the time given to us //

On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:44 PM, Alice Saunders lwr32@mac.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 


I think Apple needs to beef up security on iCloud also. Why give up iCloud information and not iPhone information? Neither should be given up. 

  \
    \  /\ 
    (   )            Alice
 .(      ).  lwr32@mac.com

On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:25 AM, Kris Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 


I don't care if they need that info or not. And I hope apple is working extra hard to beef up encryption even more on iPhones!!!

~KLM
\\ "Antisocial behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists"  ~Nikola Tesla //

On Feb 18, 2016, at 6:41 AM, Tom Warren mtnest@hartcom.net [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I would like to know if the FBI absolutely needs the, assumed, information on that phone
in order to make their case in court.

Tom






__._,_.___

Posted by: Kris Murray <krismurray@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (48)

.

__,_._,___