Exactly. The just needed to focus in the pro amd drop the price a little and IT WOULD HAVE grained traction.
~KLM
\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //
Arm, that is a joke. A fully fledged Windows experience where you cannot mix and match apps due to Arm and Intel being different.From: Kris Murray <krismurray@gmail.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, 21 July 2013 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Microsoft Writes Off $900 Million on Surface Tablets Someone on /. Said that very same thing. I think it's deeper. They should have skipped the arm version. Not confused ppl and focused on a full. Fledged windows experience with all the legacy apps on a tablet with touch UI. Then the app selection could have compared to the App Store or play store.Then again the xbox1 lost money. The 360 I think broke even. So... Maybe they can afford this ? ~KLM\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small...." ~Azim Premji //On Jul 20, 2013, at 5:18 PM, David Smith <david.smith.14916@gmail.com> wrote: Heavens. A one-billion-dollar loss. Just goes to show how intangible consumer appeal is. The Surface is an attractive little machine. Certainly overpriced, tho, since Apple already had such a big lead. They should have sold it at a loss, Amazon-wise, and built on the market share. --david@luda.netpad4
On Jul 20, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Kris Murray <krismurray@gmail.com> wrote: The estimation I read was that m$ is sitting on 6 million unsold tablets. Oops
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/492120/20130718/microsoft-takes-900-million-charge-surface-tablets.htm
~KLM
\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (5) |
.
__,_._,___