Same here.
On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Kris Murray <krismurray@gmail.com> wrote:
Hrm. My safari syncs just fine. All three of my safaris.~KLM\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //I have a Mac and dont use any other of my win machines at home anymore and spend most of my time in OSX and poccasionally arallel/bootcamp to do Win7 for work apps or do VStudio .NET coding. When at work if I ever used Safari those tabs and history would not be available when D ran Win7 to do work stuff. In.earlier Safaris when they synced I used Chrome, FF and Safari so thanks to Apple choice to not continue syncing they lost me as user on Mac and Win. So as I teach my kids, Mom and GF Mac I will show them Chrome and FF so Apple ends up with less Safari users over time.
On Jul 19, 2013 7:56 PM, "Kris Murray" <krismurray@gmail.com> wrote:OIC. I love having both safari amd chrome having pages open on all my devices. Chrome on iOS is safari with a different skink may have 60 or so pages open at the moment. So your problem is that you use a inferior OS amd apple treats it as such by not making the apps that great. Get a mac then it will be much better :-P :-P :-)~ (that was an attempt at humor)~KLM\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //Yes Chrome and Firefox are better than Safari. And sync bookmarks and open tabs and history across Windows, Apple, Android. Safari for windows does not sync :( so I quit using it on Windows once it stopped syncing :C
On Jul 19, 2013 6:42 PM, "Kris Murray" <krismurray@gmail.com> wrote:Higher MP dies not necessarily mean a better camera.And the web browser is better on other phones? Really? Between safari amd chrome heck I can't see what would be better
~KLM\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //Best for me too, but for the uses a smartphone has, calls, texts, websites, GPS, camera, there is not much to separate the top end phones. There is a better website and camera experience on other models. Tablet-wise, the iPad is clearly superior though, that's where the apps, and ecosystem come into their own
From: Alice <whiterabbit32@gmail.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups..com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 19 July 2013 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [iPad] The Battle Between iOS and Android Is About Apps | Mac360My iPhone is the best phone I've used. I had Nokia candy bar phones and flip phones before that.\\ /\ Alice.( ). Sent from my iPad miniOn Jul 18, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz> wrote:I will clarify. Mention has been that apps are the key, others say that the phone is the key. For me, if for some theoretical reason I had to dispense with one of my iDevices, it would be the iPhone. I can easily replace with another phone that is as good or better, I cannot do that with my iPads, or Apple TV. And once I am up to speed with OSX, my iMac. I desire my iPhone, but I desire it the least.
From: Alice <whiterabbit32@gmail.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups..com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 19 July 2013 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] The Battle Between iOS and Android Is About Apps | Mac360Why would you drop the iPhone for one less expensive? I don't think I'd be happy outside if iOS for my phone. I dislike Windows and have used Android and don't like it either. I don't like having to "put up" with something I've paid for. I like iOS. I don't have to make myself use it.\\ /\ Alice.( ). Sent from my iPad miniOn Jul 18, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz> wrote:I feel that once you have an iPhone, it becomes more about the apps, the lack of ads, the benefits of the closed ecosystem. Newbies are possibly more into the brand. Apart from those that are young but phone literate.For me, now, the iPhone is probably the device I would drop if I had to drop one of my Apple devices. I can easily replace that with a non Apple phone that I would be happy with, but cannot do that with the iPads. There is no iPad matching tablet out there.From: Alice <whiterabbit32@gmail.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups..com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 19 July 2013 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] The Battle Between iOS and Android Is About Apps | Mac360Was just talking to Rob (hubby). He's been working for VZ for 5 days now in their call transfer center. The calls come in and he figures out what dept. to transfer the call to, tech, sales etc. He's observed that just in the 5 days he's worked there that most of his calls are either 'I'm having trouble with my Samsung, HTC etc Android phone or I want to buy an iPhone. He said he's only had maybe 4-5 iPhone trouble calls. He estimates maybe 50:1 calls for help with Android phones vs iPhones. That's just him. He doesn't know about other reps calls. Also, Rob was told in training that the only overtime offered is when new iPhones come out. In this case I think the iOS vs Android is more than just about apps.\\ /\ Alice.( ). Sent from my iPad miniOn Jul 18, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Carl Brooks <carl@iamthereforeipad.com> wrote:Remember how hard Apple fought Palm to keep its iTunes computer app from syncing with the Palm devices. Surely Apple could have benefited from selling music to non iPods and iPhone, but they are not interested in gaining tons of support headaches for supporting non-Apple devices.. The monetary gain was not worth it.. As it turned out, Apple was right and Palm eventually was a non-factor after years as the mobile device leader. Apple makes boat loads of cash without having to have everyone as a customer. Apple fan boys think that Apple has to rule the mobile world, the reality is their is plenty of room for multiple players. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 17, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Just Murray <mailto:krismurray%40gmail.com> wrote: > No. Apple will only market to its walled garden
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (63) |
.
__,_._,___