Not the best explanation I have seen, but try this
http://www.google.co.nz/imgres?imgurl=http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/highpants_superhidef_pentile_subpixel_matrix.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.extremetech.com/electronics/129247-samsung-says-galaxy-s3-screen-longevity&usg=__IBDNKl9DekaQZe7vxu0ilCpH6BM=&h=480&w=640&sz=57&hl=en&start=2&zoom=1&tbnid=hMqnX1Z8HbhpUM:&tbnh=103&tbnw=137&ei=AGRsUZ-SMs3xiAfSt4CoDw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpentile%26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-US%26rlz%3D1I7ADFA_en%26hl%3Den%26tbm%3Disch&itbs=1&sa=X&ved=0CC0QrQMwAQ
From: David H. Bailey <dhbailey52@comcast.net>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] For those decrying Apple not keeping up with the competition
http://www.google.co.nz/imgres?imgurl=http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/highpants_superhidef_pentile_subpixel_matrix.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.extremetech.com/electronics/129247-samsung-says-galaxy-s3-screen-longevity&usg=__IBDNKl9DekaQZe7vxu0ilCpH6BM=&h=480&w=640&sz=57&hl=en&start=2&zoom=1&tbnid=hMqnX1Z8HbhpUM:&tbnh=103&tbnw=137&ei=AGRsUZ-SMs3xiAfSt4CoDw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpentile%26sa%3DX%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-US%26rlz%3D1I7ADFA_en%26hl%3Den%26tbm%3Disch&itbs=1&sa=X&ved=0CC0QrQMwAQ
From: David H. Bailey <dhbailey52@comcast.net>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] For those decrying Apple not keeping up with the competition
Now I'm confused -- what the heck is an "artificial 441 ppi?" Either
there are 441 pixels per inch or there aren't. Does the device
hypnotize the user into thinking there are actually 441 pixels per inch?
I'd love to be enlightened.
David H. Bailey
On 4/15/2013 3:40 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>
> A real, physical 326 ppi is much superior to an artificial 441 ppi
> iPhones 326 is much superior up close
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Jim Saklad <jimdoc@icloud.com>
> *To:* iPad@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 16 April 2013 2:48 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [iPad] For those decrying Apple not keeping up with the
> competition
>
> >> The article is completely wrong on the display. The Samsung S4 is
> 1920x1080 at 441 ppi
> >
> > Are we at a point where the difference between something like Apple's
> 250 (or so) ppi and Samsung's 441 ppi don't really matter in terms of
> how well the user can read the display?
>
> iPhone is 326 ppi
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad
> mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com <mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
David H. Bailey
dhbailey@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com
there are 441 pixels per inch or there aren't. Does the device
hypnotize the user into thinking there are actually 441 pixels per inch?
I'd love to be enlightened.
David H. Bailey
On 4/15/2013 3:40 PM, Tony wrote:
>
>
> A real, physical 326 ppi is much superior to an artificial 441 ppi
> iPhones 326 is much superior up close
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Jim Saklad <jimdoc@icloud.com>
> *To:* iPad@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 16 April 2013 2:48 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [iPad] For those decrying Apple not keeping up with the
> competition
>
> >> The article is completely wrong on the display. The Samsung S4 is
> 1920x1080 at 441 ppi
> >
> > Are we at a point where the difference between something like Apple's
> 250 (or so) ppi and Samsung's 441 ppi don't really matter in terms of
> how well the user can read the display?
>
> iPhone is 326 ppi
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad
> mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com <mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
David H. Bailey
dhbailey@davidbaileymusicstudio.com
http://www.davidbaileymusicstudio.com
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (18) |
.
__,_._,___