I agree - for work use, the wrist is probably OK, though not ideal. Under wrist.
--
david@luda.netpad4
Yes, agree, more portable for the medical apps. For an alternative/additon to the smartphone for the non medical app user, I am not so sure.
From: Pabitra Saha <pksaha000@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 29 April 2013 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Perhaps this is what iWatch may be all about.
I think the population of the world is ageing.In other words, average age is increasing.In addition, modern medicine is becoming more advanced in terms of providing advanced symptoms much earlier.Any such device would be very useful to all, sooner or later.It is more portable since it is attached to the body all the time.BestPKSI agree. The jogger/cyclist market I expect. The tablet is restrictive compared to a laptop, but far more portable, so a winner. Phone is more restrictive than a tablet, but far more portable, so a winner. A watch is more restrictive than a phone, but no little more portable.If it has these medical type sensors, the fitness market, but that's small, relatively. For the remainder of us, a cool gadget, that probably will add little usefulness, just coolnessFrom: David Smith <david.smith.14916@gmail.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, 27 April 2013 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Perhaps this is what iWatch may be all about.
Doesn't do a thing for me. The wrist is an awkward place for anything.. Think of all the muscles you use when you use just to raise your wrist to your face. Gadget.Or not. Who knows what people will buy?On Apr 26, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Pabitra Saha <pksaha000@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
__._,_.___
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (15) |
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___