Tony,
I hate to say it, but if the user knew what they wanted, we wouldn't have smartphones at all.
cjc
On 28 Jan 2014, at 4:30 pm, Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Ah ok, fair enough. I thought you may have been referring to that Apple decided that its one handed size was best.Well as regards quality, I cant see why a larger phone would be an issue. Sizes sub standard? Well, the user knows what size they want, what suits their needs best, and there's been two years of these discussions about the lack of a larger size, so it seems the market knows what it wants. I will find a larger size inconvenient. I find the 4", being tall and skinny inconvenient to reach the top right edge in one hand. But like those who want a bigger phone, the real estate benefit outweighs the one hand benefit. One size doesnt actually fit all. Many prefer the larger iPad, many refer the mini iPad. As lomg as they cater for the one handers who prefer 4 or 3.5, and the others, everyone is happy
From: Just Murray <krismurray@gmail.com>
To: "<iPad@yahoogroups.com>" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2014 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [iPad] iPad Pro (rumoured)maybe it thinks those others sizes are ones it cant do well enough to meet its own standards because it thinks those sizes are substandard to begin with was kinda more what i meant.~kmOn Jan 27, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz> wrote:I wasnt mentioning quality I was mentioning sizes
__._,_.___
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (46) |
.
__,_._,___