Re: [iPad] So what may be the future of apple tv?

 

He did not call you an "idiot". He called you a "problem".


There is a HUGE difference between the two.

You appear to have a problem understanding the english language as well. At least, that is what I read in the messages.

cjc

PS I have found that the more technical a person is, the harder they find Apple products to setup & integrate, but that might be just me!

On 06/06/2012, at 7:35 AM, Charles Carroll wrote:

 

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
 

>> Show me "idiot" in my post.
>> NOT calling you an idiot, then, I guess makes me NOT rude.
>> But bringing up idiocy in your reply, well, ....
>
> You said:
>
>> Maybe it is not the product that is the problem, but the user.
>> It took me (age 67) a few minutes to set up.

Believe me, *I* know what I said.

So when you said 'the product that is the problem, but the user.' you did not mean that? You said either the PRODUCT or the USER is the problem. Since you setup the product quickly that means the other possibility the USER is the problem.

Just admit you called the USER the problem and defended a lame setup that works well for some users and works horribly for many including veteran users of several OSes. I don't mind being insulted by careless use of language but denying you insulted me because you misused the English language I am not fine with. I am the user and if AppleTV is fine according to your sentence structure the User i.e. me is the problem.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___