>> Show me "idiot" in my post.
>> NOT calling you an idiot, then, I guess makes me NOT rude.
>> But bringing up idiocy in your reply, well, ....
>
> You said:
>
>> Maybe it is not the product that is the problem, but the user.
>> It took me (age 67) a few minutes to set up.
Believe me, *I* know what I said.
> The strong implication is that the USER (in this case me) is a problem not the product. So the problem could be many things but the assumption that you 67 could setup fast and I could not means I am the problem. Now you did not say the problem is that I am an idiot but calling anyone a 'problem user' implies they did something wrong and did not know something.
Actually, we have both been ignoring the obvious third alternative, which your subsequent messages (subsequent to my posting my reply) have elucidated.
It ain't just "user" OR "product".
It's "user" OR "product" OR "system" (into which it is being installed).
Which includes cabling, brand of wired and/or wireless router, remote being used (e.g., hardware vs. App), and more.
You have now made it clear that your problems were less the product than they were mating the product to your system.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
Re: [iPad] So what may be the future of apple tv?
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___