Enlighten me. I don't have a concern either way. In a country that is most exposed to terrorism, is it not ideal to expose a terrorist who has info on his iPhone? I gather that privacy for the millions of honest users who pose no threat is more important? I'm confused
You're willing to give up.whst little privacy we still have? To me, making Apple put in a backdoor to iOS so the government can take our data anytime they deem necessary and for any reason is like allowing the government the right to come into our homes for the same reasons.
Alice
1. In the words of Founding Father Benjamin Franklin:
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
2. The San Bernardino attack seems to have been an example of workplace violence — "going postal" — committed by a couple who happen to be Muslin, but with no apparent connections to terrorist organizations.
As far as I can see, the only "terrorism" in this case is that being committed by the FBI against the American people, and American businesses.
3. Who would willingly open their health records, banking accounts and passwords, personal communications, and business secrets to the prying eyes of anyone who could figure out how to use the back-door the FBI is asking for?
Including, for example, the Chinese government?
__._,_.___
Posted by: Jim Saklad <jimdoc@icloud.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (24) |
.
__,_._,___