Re: [iPad] AW - radiation

 


Not me, but it's an ongoing concern - rather than a worry - that all this wireless stuff raises.  What I'm a little afraid of is that the news media will treat it with kid gloves, because so much of the economy now relies on it.  There'll be behind-the-scenes pressure not to rock that very important boat.

Like any technical issue, the mass media are ill-equipped to inform intelligently.  They're much better at exploiting pop hooks and at scandal-mongering.




On Sep 28, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Just Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

I've never been worried but anyone got any radiation science facts to share that would help the understanding? Or links? 

~KLM
\\ "Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing." ~Helen Keller //

On Sep 27, 2014, at 4:39 PM, "Jim Saklad jimdoc@icloud.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

> I wonder whether the Watch, which, unlike the Phone, will be in prolonged contact with the body, will start to raise radiation worries.

Of course it will.
The great majority of the population has minimal understanding of radiation physics.

> Ever since pagers, these little radios have been part of our daily attire, but other than the rare news story about a law-enforcement person's developing a tumor near where she carries her radio, the media - at least, the popular media - have ignored the issue, creating or reinforcing the attitude that it's just one more unavoidable risk of daily living in the modern world.

As I said.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com

__._,_.___

Posted by: david smith <david.smith.14916@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (11)

.

__,_._,___