Re: [iPad] iPad Pro Review: Why I Returned the New iPad

 


Hear, hear.


On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Tony tdale@xtra.co.nz [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

and OSX on a tablet can dispense wth  lot of crud. Easier to make iOS have no restrictions so you can do what you wish, best of both worlds


From: "Lloyd Parsons lloydp21@live.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 28 November 2015 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [iPad] iPad Pro Review: Why I Returned the New iPad

 
I've got touch on my Pixel Chromebook and use it all the time for scrolling the screen and such, much handier than using the trackpad imo.  Frankly to add minimal touch-ability to OS X wouldn't add much to the code at all.

Lloyd




From: <iPad@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of "Kris Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, November 27, 2015 at 5:50 PM
To: <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [iPad] iPad Pro Review: Why I Returned the New iPad

 
Agreed. Yea gorilla arm would be a problem. I think it's the wrong way to go. But, that said, it's possible. 

~KLM
\\ "Antisocial behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists"  ~Nikola Tesla //

On Nov 27, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Jim Saklad jimdoc@icloud.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

There is nothing in MacOS X that deals with touch/screen sensing.
Adding that would bloat the operating system, for a tiny fraction of users that would ask for it, many of whom would quickly discover that they don't like reaching up and out to tap


__._,_.___

Posted by: David Smith <david.smith.14916@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (35)

.

__,_._,___