I live in the Northbay, Sonoma county and we are all okay. We were certainly rockin' & rollin' but no damage or injuries. This one was actually worse for us than the 1989 quake because the epicenter was much closer than 89. I appreciate the concern.
Tony M
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 3:19 PM, "Jim Saklad jimdoc@icloud.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> I hope our fellow posters in the San Francisco area are all ok, or as ok as they can be.
>
> Brings back bad memories of 4 Sept 2010 and 22 Feb 2011 here in Christchurch, NZ
References:
<http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72282711#summary>
<http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72282711#pager>
<http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72282711#shakemap>
The major *geologic/seismic* difference is that the California coastal system is
a plate boundary that is sliding sideways and the New Zealand system is a megathrust subduction zone, which typically can produce the worst shakers.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
>
> Brings back bad memories of 4 Sept 2010 and 22 Feb 2011 here in Christchurch, NZ
References:
<http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72282711#summary>
<http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72282711#pager>
<http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72282711#shakemap>
The major *geologic/seismic* difference is that the California coastal system is
a plate boundary that is sliding sideways and the New Zealand system is a megathrust subduction zone, which typically can produce the worst shakers.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <nyrngrz@yahoo.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
.
__,_._,___