You're right IF they don't care. You and I know what will happen though. Things get tough and they start caring. That means a rescue. Therefore, there should be some sort if punishment. Hitting the person in the course strings is where people might get the message.
Why rescue ppl who don't care? Why mandate costs?? Why does life matter if the person doesn't care? Christianity? You do realize that's just one point of view right?
~KM--\,,/(^_^)\,,/(^= I rocked this email on my iPad2 =^)---Why do you disagree with mandatory evacuation? If everyone heeded them, less rescuer would be put in danger and less people would die.
\
\ /\
( ) Alice
.( ). whiterabbit32@gmail.com
Just Murray <krismurray@gmail.com> wrote:
I disagree with mandatory evacuations. I disagree with suicide being illegal. 7 billion people. One less by choice is ok.~KLM\,,/ 01001100 01001111 01001100 \,,/Evac warnings are one thing but when they say "mandatory" there should be citations or something given to people for not following the mandatory evac. I watched perfectly healthy, able bodied people being rescued after a mandatory evac was issued in NYC.
\
\ /\
( ) Alice
.( ). whiterabbit32@gmail.com
Just Murray <krismurray@gmail.com> wrote:
Yea. Pot is a bad as heroin and methamphetamine. Wolf syndrome. Got it.
~KLM
\,,/ 01001100 01001111 01001100 \,,/
On Oct 30, 2012, at 4:31 PM, "Ed" <huckleberryed@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would surmise one reason is the "wolf syndrome". Governments often play it safe and issue evacuation warnings for events that never turn serious or deadly for these neighborhoods. After awhile, People tend to discount such warnings
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (131) |
