Friends Kingdom: Re: [iPad] Re: Miffed at Siri

Scott Hanselman wrote a review of how nice the detail on all pictures was.

i remember someone telling me no one could ever use more fhan 640k of RAM.

i think no one is unhappy when pictures of scenery or loved ones look even more detailed.

Also I often photograph signed documents for recruiters they would prefer it looked even better when they recieved.

On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Christopher Collins iphone@analogdigital.com.au [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

And what bonus would that provide to the "average user" other than bragging rites?

cjc

On 1 Jan 2016, at 12:46 PM, Myrddin Wyllt myrddinwyllt1964@gmail.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I still think a lot more resolution in Camera would be amazing. Still impressed at the 40+ megapixel camera one of the Windows phone had.

Apple could have bought or copied that technology and Leapfrogged Android.

On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Kris Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Clearly they wouldn't be adding features from Windows phone lol its popularity indicates no one likes it. At least android has a user base lol

~KLM
\\ "Antisocial behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists" ~Nikola Tesla //

On Dec 31, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Tony tdale@xtra.co.nz [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

They have been adding features from other platforms, chiefly Android for a few years now. While often lite, they are added. Clearly there were no security issues.

From: "Myrddin Wyllt myrddinwyllt1964@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: iPad <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 1 January 2016 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Miffed at Siri

But it is a BROAD statement Jim so broad as to be fairly meaningless. We can all agree at least we like the high security that Apple holds themselves too. But I have seen features and API that have no security risks (well in true scientific/hacker terms very tiny) being vetoed as if they are for security reasons by experts and the beginners and intermediate types then become afraid of that feature for no reason.

We all agree Apple security is way better than Android or Windows or Linux and iOS is more secure than the Mac.

A lot of the features Apple users ask for, and I and others have mentioned on the list, are in fact not an opening for Malware..

And while I think Apple has a great history of very few successful Malware attacks in the wild - the fact is they can copy many features of Windows and Android and the Mac and not open themselves to security risks.

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Alice Saunders lwr32@mac.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I agree Jim. I'm very happy with Apple products not being open to malware.

  \
  \ /\
  ( ) Alice
.( ). lwr32@mac.com

On Dec 27, 2015, at 9:21 PM, Jim Saklad jimdoc@icloud.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> My fault is that any discussion here that if any way, has a negative slant to Apple, annoys and upsets some people. Hence extremely biased, hence it becomes a fan group at the expense of discussion

My problem is with folks who dump on a company because some feature isn't the way they want it, or doesn't work perfectly first time out of the box, and frequently cite the competition as a Good Example, even though some of the "good" things about the competition are what has left them wide open to malware.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad  mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com