Re: [iPad] Re: No, Apple's Music Streaming App Looks Nothing Like Beats | WIRED

 

Give us some differentiations. Some wheels are just round, not a lot that can be added. As I see it, Apple just jumping on the bandwagon and nothing wrong with that. If others are selling, Apple should too

From: "David Smith david.smith.14916@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 16 June 2015 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Re: No, Apple's Music Streaming App Looks Nothing Like Beats | WIRED

 


Yeah, what Apple's doing with music over the Internet seems to be a bunch of things rolled into one kinda confusing ball of wax.  I don't know why it has to be confusing.  Maybe I'm the only one who's confused, but I don't think so.

Apple is just imitating other people, and from what I see so far, they're not differentiating themselves sufficiently from the others to make themselves extremely attractive.  That's too bad, and I don't think it was inevitable.  Lack of creative spark.

Steve!  Come back!




On 6/15/2015 10:45 AM, Pat Taylor pat412@mac.com [iPad] wrote:
 
For the monthly fee, you can stream or download any songs from the iTunes catalog provided that the artist allows streaming of his music.  This how Rhapsody, Tidal, etched. Work as well.

Pat 

Sent from my iPad Air2

On Jun 15, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Carol Corley floridabouvs@yahoo.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
Thanks, Pat. So it looks like they are trying to draw people away from iTunes, where we have music we purchased or downloaded from CDs, and change us to a $10 a month service, where we won't get to choose what we hear.
I will continue to watch, since I already pay for XM on 2 cars and really like Pandora (free).
And mostly listen to my iTunes, anyway.
Carol


Pat wrote:



__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (29)

.

__,_._,___