On 10/18/2013 6:10 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
[snip]
> But the Surface 2 (non pro) is a 'value' product and will either be a
> big seller or a dog. The history of the Surface RT is that it will be a
> dog in the marketplace. [snip]
I think that one of the big reasons that the Surface has been a dog in
the marketplace is the horrible advertising campaigns. And the same
will be true for these new versions if Microsoft doesn't find a new
advertising company to build a campaign for them.
What seems so odd is that in days gone by, MS was very good at marketing with ads that made sense. But for the Surface, even print/web ads aren't very good from a 'real info' point of view.Those original Surface ads where everybody was dancing around and
clicking their keyboards onto their tablets showed nothing about what
the Surface could do, it didn't show any of the apps, it didn't show
anybody really doing anything other than looking incredibly stupid and
unproductive. No wonder nobody went out to buy one!
And the more recent campaign (where it only showed some of what it was
capable of and then only in comparison to the iPad in an effort to
denigrate the iPad) never really showed anybody using a Surface and
oohing and ahing over how wonderful it was and what a great enhancement
to their life it was.
In both campaigns we never really saw any fairly normal human being
actually using their Surface.
Compare that to Apple's much better ad campaigns for both the iPad and
the iPhones -- it shows people all around the world using their iDevices
in real-world situations and everybody is making good use of them.
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (59) |