fair point, that does make a difference
From: "Christopher Collins iphone@analogdigital.com.au [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] The 227-Year-Old Statute Being Used to Order Apple to Endanger Your Privacy, Explained
Remember Tony, it is not certain that there is any info on the phone that fulfils the requirements of "terrorism".
The FBI is just doing a search of this phone for possible information.
They do not KNOW that there is anything bad there.
cic
On 18 Feb 2016, at 8:10 PM, Tony tdale@xtra.co.nz [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups..com> wrote:Enlighten me. I don't have a concern either way. In a country that is most exposed to terrorism, is it not ideal to expose a terrorist who has info on his iPhone? I gather that privacy for the millions of honest users who pose no threat is more important? Im confused
__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (21) |
.
__,_._,___