Its my tax dollars at work in situations that never needed to be if people leave when told to. That way s&r can be where they're really needed and my tax dollars are going where its really needed.
\
\ /\
( ) Alice
.( ). whiterabbit32@gmail.com
petefromflorida <petefromflorida@gmail.com> wrote:
People that are involved in search and rescue are paid to do that. It's in their job description. It's their choice, they aren't forced to do it.
Pete
--- In iPad@yahoogroups.com, Julia Mavity-Hudson <julie.mavity@...> wrote:
>
> It would be one thing if those who ignored evac orders were torching only
> themselves, but they rial the lives of those who have to rescue them as
> well, plus it costs a lot of money for search and rescue. They ought to
> have to pay that back it seems to me.
> Julie
> On Oct 31, 2012 2:20 AM, "Alice" <whiterabbit32@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Evac warnings are one thing but when they say "mandatory" there should be
> > citations or something given to people for not following the mandatory
> > evac. I watched perfectly healthy, able bodied people being rescued after a
> > mandatory evac was issued in NYC.
> > \
> > \ /\
> > ( ) Alice
> > .( ). whiterabbit32@...
> >
> > Just Murray <krismurray@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Yea. Pot is a bad as heroin and methamphetamine. Wolf syndrome. Got it.
> >
> > ~KLM
> > \,,/ 01001100 01001111 01001100 \,,/
> >
> > On Oct 30, 2012, at 4:31 PM, "Ed" <huckleberryed@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I would surmise one reason is the "wolf syndrome". Governments often
> > play it safe and issue evacuation warnings for events that never turn
> > serious or deadly for these neighborhoods. After awhile, People tend to
> > discount such warnings
> >
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (52) |
