Re: [iPad] Another Vulnerability, and this is crazy

 

I thought that too, re only a jailbreak, but employers can side load custom apps legitimately with Apple, thats the way in

From: "Just Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 14 November 2014 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Another Vulnerability, and this is crazy

 
It's typical click bait. Ohh macs get viruses. Oh they are wrong look see iPads get viruses. Never mind that they aren't viruses and they require a jailbreak that's details that don't matter as much as the clicks we want or the crock of sh*t we wanna stir. 

~Kris M.
\\ "Life is either a daring adventure or nothing." ~Helen Keller //

On Nov 10, 2014, at 3:32 PM, tdale@xtra.co.nz [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 
MacRumours has an article on a new vulnerability



As it requires the user to be using a non App Store App Store, I can only assume this applies only to jailbreaked iPhone/iPad. Ok, thats the risk you take, fair enough.

The crazy bit is a few articles down MacRumours article is about the latest jailbreak thats out. Is that crazy or what? Penning a vulnerability article that doesn't mention the word jailbreak, then penning a article on the latest jailbreak?


__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (4)

.

__,_._,___