Right, Tony. I didn't get that one correct, either ! L
Maybe its all that radioactive stuff drifting around here from Japan?
Ed in Oregon
From: iPad@yahoogroups.com [mailto:iPad@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 2:58 PM
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iPad] iPad Mini
Hi Ed,
Tony here from NZ, I think it was my post you were referring to, not Alices, but no problem, all good
From: Ed <huckleberryed@gmail.com>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 27 October 2012 5:23 AM
Subject: RE: [iPad] iPad Mini
White Rabbit - I was not trying to be snide with my comment on Mini resolution. I just happened to remember that they had the same screen resolution specifications as the standard iPad2 and wished to comment. I had assumed that Apple Mini was therefore using the same technology for a display screen as the iPad2. Imagine covering half of an iPad2 screen… thereby simulating looking at a Mini's screen. In this example, you could not expect the 'smaller' display to have any better resolution, right? This is what crossed my mind when reading your post. However, after posting that comment, I did go and look at the comparison specs and saw that the pixels are smaller on the Mini, thus giving more pixels per square inch on a mini by a small margin… and thus perhaps seen as better quality. So I did issue a retraction to my comment last night. I am still puzzled by the discrepancy of specifications…. How can Apple claim the same screen resolution specs when the pixels per square inch are different…..
In any case, No insult was intended.
Ed in Oregon
Hi Jim
Yes, unclear. I think, and assume it was to my post, that as the Mini is smaller, the pixels will be smaller and closer together, thereby giving a better image on a smaller screen. I did qualify that as I think that, so didnt appreciate his exclamated "your incorrect?!
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (28) |
