To each his own 😎
Really?Isn't it the same or close in size and weight to a 5S? AFAIK its little more then an iPhone with no cellular
From: "David Smith david.smith.14916@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 17 July 2015 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] Daring Fireball: Apple Introduces New A8-Based iPod Touch
The Touch is minimalism at its best. The iPhone is boxy and heavy and comes complete with kitchen sink.Why not September? I'I'd say as some will say, why dont we pay some extra dollars and get an iPhone, as that's a Touch as wellNow, more sales possibly
From: "Kris Murray krismurray@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: iPad Yahoo Group <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 17 July 2015 7:31 AM
Subject: [iPad] Daring Fireball: Apple Introduces New A8-Based iPod Touch
Daring Fireball: Apple Introduces New A8-Based iPod Touch APPLE INTRODUCES NEW A8-BASED IPOD TOUCH
Fascinating. First, the previous iPod Touch was introduced way back in 2012, alongside the iPhone 5 — a lot of people had reasonably assumed the iPod Touch was dead. Apparently not. Second, it's jumped all the way from an A5 to an A8 — from outdated to state-of-the-art. Third, unlike the iPhones 6, the screen didn't get bigger. Lastly, why introduce this mid-July with a press release? Why not do it in September?The obvious answer: Apple cares enough about the Touch to update it, but not enough to spend even a few minutes on it during the September new iPhone event. Same for the refreshed iPods Nano and Shuffle. Apple's website no longer even lists "iPod" as one of the top-level menu items.★ Wednesday, 15 July 2015~KLM\\ "Antisocial behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists" ~Nikola Tesla //
__._,_.___
Posted by: David Smith <david.smith.14916@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
.
__,_._,___