You nailed it, square in the head. Basically, there's a lot of folks scapegoating Apple for enforcing limits it had already set at the beginning. The way I see it, Apple could have been at risk for Federal intervention due to the fact that most app-devs were adhering to the rule, while a conspicuous few were being 'permitted' to ignore/violate it.
--ryan
Sent from my Apple iPad 2
Sent from my Apple iPad 2
See, here is what I do not understand. According to everything I have read--including things from Apple and on various dev forums--Apple has always restricted in-app purchases.
According to your post, Amazon is calling something that has always (apparently) been a part of the contract. so Amazon is not being truthful in that they are blaming Apple by calling this a recent change.
To be fair to Apple, Amazon apparently broke the rules and violated Apple's TOS.
Can anyone clarify?
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___