Best
On 02 Oct 2014, at 15:47, "mary davidson mary.davidson@gmail.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Health monitoring increases with age. I would think there is a large percentage of those who could use this that are 65 or older.
Mary Davidson
On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:42 PM, David Smith david.smith.14916@gmail.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Jim Saklad jimdoc@icloud.com [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> We can certainly monitor heart rate and blood oxygen saturation non-invasively now.
> Lots of folks are working on nin-invasive, transcutaneous blood glucose monitoring, but we're not there yet.
How important is remote monitoring of health variables? A number is only one piece of a person's overall health.
Most people simply have a physical in an office once a year. They rarely need more.
A statistically tiny number of people have a real need for this - perhaps most importantly diabetics. But this health-monitoring industry is aiming at everyone. Seems to me much mote a passing fad than something groundbreaking.
------------------------------------
Posted by: David Smith <david.smith.14916@gmail.com>
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
Posted by: Pabitra Saha <pksaha000@yahoo.co.uk>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (307) |
