In general I do minimum post shot editing. Rarely I'll crop. Usually I'll stitch. Much of the time I'll saturate the colors a wee bit. That's about it.
So. I agree do as much as possible with the composition first.
~KLM
\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //
As long as you can get the composition pretty good, you can edit your photos to make them look better. I don't like to depend completely on editing. I like to try and shoot the photo the best I can before editing.Practice makes perfect. I was lucky enough to shoot hundred of photos a month through much of the 90s and 00s. I'm not good but I can easily get the photo I like ;)~KLM\\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //That might work for you but I'm a lousy photographer. I have absolutely no talent.
Pete
--- In iPad@yahoogroups.com, Kris Murray <krismurray@...> wrote:
>
> I disagree. Getting a good photo is planning and experience. Getting a good snapshot is a numbers game (luck). The two are different images. The exception is that it takes planning and luck as with action shots. Otherwise the luck non planning shot is IMO classified as a snap shot an Instagram of sorts
>
> ~KLM
> \\ "If people are not laughing at your goals, your goals are too small..." ~Azim Premji //
>
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:07 AM, "petefromflorida" <petefromflorida@...> wrote:
>
> > Getting a good picture is mostly luck and some help from Photoshop.
>
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (11) |
.
__,_._,___