Friends Kingdom: Re: [iPad] Re: Tattoos again - problem now confirmed by Apple

What I meant was. There are implications and things that happen because of getting your arm COVERED in ink that one must consider before doing this. Future kids. Future employers. Future this. Future that. While unseen this is one of those things that one MUST consider before getting COVERED in ink. While my extensive ink is elsewhere I certainly realize it could have an impact upon my life. Apparently I won't be getting an apple watch stapled to my back lol

~KLM

\\ "Antisocial behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists" ~Nikola Tesla //

On May 3, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Tony tdale@xtra.co.nz [iPad] <iPad@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Hmm

I doubt that two years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago, these people rolled up to get their tatts and thought, "shall I or shall I not, as I do want an Apple Watch in 2015"

From: "Devitt devittad@comcast.net [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: "iPad@yahoogroups.com" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 4 May 2015 11:52 AM
Subject: [iPad] Re: Tattoos again - problem now confirmed by Apple

> I don't see this as a problem. I mean a person with a thousand dollar arm tattoo has to understand they altered their skin and products which interact with it may perform differently.

I agree. The watch works on all natural skin colors. The inks of tattoos block sensor light. It's unfortunate, but I don't imagine a workaround will be easy -- or even possible.

Any scientists or engineers in the group have insight into the situation?

Cathy

Sent from my iPad 