Thats true. Cooks tenure, not Jobs, but it was a different market then. IMHO both have succeeded.
What I find amusing is Apple growth slows. Ok, cool, it slows, but it still grew, so the stocks drop. Stupid. If investors want a stock that grows and grows and grows, buy a ponzi stock.
From: "Jim Saklad jimdoc@icloud.com [iPad]" <iPad@yahoogroups.com>
To: iPad@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, 23 July 2016 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [iPad] winning the lottery
Apple's net cash at the end of the 3rd quarter of 2015 (total cash minus total debt) was roughly $149 BILLION. That was up $28 BILLION during the previous 11 quarters. And that isn't even all of the Tim Cook era.
Nothing matters but how many marbles you have?
You stated:
Apple got rich on the iPhone, and Tim Cook is using the windfall to push the company into a very different place from the one in which it was when Steve Jobs died. I'm afraid that Tim is in the process of burning through all that cash
So predicating the success of Apple on the cash available was YOUR argument.
I merely pointed out that much, if not most of the present cash available was earned during Cook's tenure, not Jobs'.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Tony <tdale@xtra.co.nz>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (13) |
Save time and get your email on the go with the Yahoo Mail app
Get the beautifully designed, lighting fast, and easy-to-use Yahoo Mail today. Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
.
__,_._,___