> Isn't this really an iOS vs Android comparison? Not iPhone 5 vs Galaxy 4? Apart from the LTE battery usage assuming the S4 which isnt released is as per below?
5 points:
1. Screen quality -- hardware, not OS
2. Battery life -- partly hardware, partly OS
3. Music -- proprietary App, not so much OS *or* hardware
4. App Store -- proprietary App, and OS
5. Compatibility -- clearly an OS issue
> While I do agree with the article, on second thinking of it it does seem odd as the S4 is not released so no one supposedly knows the innards.
PCPro <http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/380194/samsung-galaxy-s4-price-specs-release-date-revealed> says:
> The Samsung Galaxy S4 has been unveiled in New York. Samsung's flagship smartphone has a host of high-end hardware features and a battery of new Samsung services to go with it.
>
> Here are full details of the specs, services, release date and price.
> And in any case, someone can write an equally compelling opposite, so in that respect it does seem a bit one sided.
When you find it, then post it here.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (5) |
